<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who needs a jury when we have Nancy Grace?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/04/13/rants/nancy-grace/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/04/13/rants/nancy-grace/</link>
	<description>It Do What It Do</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:07:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gatton</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/04/13/rants/nancy-grace/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Gatton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 21:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idwid.com/blog/archives/16#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Fortunately she apologizes on air when the accused are acquitted right? Anybody?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fortunately she apologizes on air when the accused are acquitted right? Anybody?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apollo</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/04/13/rants/nancy-grace/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Apollo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 02:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idwid.com/blog/archives/16#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Not to mention, she stretches the truth a bit:

http://www.observer.com/20060306/20060306_Rebecca_Dana_pageone_nytv.asp

And doesn&#039;t care as much about ethics as she claims:

http://www.law.com/jsp/printerfriendly.jsp?c=LawArticle&amp;t=PrinterFriendlyArticle&amp;cid=1115111123854</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention, she stretches the truth a bit:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.observer.com/20060306/20060306_Rebecca_Dana_pageone_nytv.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.observer.com/20060306/20060306_Rebecca_Dana_pageone_nytv.asp</a></p>
<p>And doesn&#8217;t care as much about ethics as she claims:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/printerfriendly.jsp?c=LawArticle&#038;t=PrinterFriendlyArticle&#038;cid=1115111123854" rel="nofollow">http://www.law.com/jsp/printerfriendly.jsp?c=LawArticle&#038;t=PrinterFriendlyArticle&#038;cid=1115111123854</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hotshot309</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/04/13/rants/nancy-grace/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Hotshot309</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 04:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idwid.com/blog/archives/16#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Nancy Grace must be a unanimously ridiculed moron--Law and Order: Criminal Intent even came up with a fictional analogue to Grace, whose annoying dyed-blond Southern head and outrageous one-sided comments--which are meant to caricature Grace but are pretty true to life--&quot;Grace&quot; the show with their presence every few episodes.

I think Nancy Grace just didn&#039;t make the cut for Fox News, so she ended up on CNN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nancy Grace must be a unanimously ridiculed moron&#8211;Law and Order: Criminal Intent even came up with a fictional analogue to Grace, whose annoying dyed-blond Southern head and outrageous one-sided comments&#8211;which are meant to caricature Grace but are pretty true to life&#8211;&#8221;Grace&#8221; the show with their presence every few episodes.</p>
<p>I think Nancy Grace just didn&#8217;t make the cut for Fox News, so she ended up on CNN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

