<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I have an announcement for Jon &amp; Kate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/06/22/tv/jon-and-kate-announcement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/06/22/tv/jon-and-kate-announcement/</link>
	<description>It Do What It Do</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:07:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Humph</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/06/22/tv/jon-and-kate-announcement/comment-page-1/#comment-970</link>
		<dc:creator>Humph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jammersblog.com/?p=395#comment-970</guid>
		<description>With the amount of effort you wasted on this post, Jammer, you could&#039;ve knocked out half a Trek: TNG review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the amount of effort you wasted on this post, Jammer, you could&#8217;ve knocked out half a Trek: TNG review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg M</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/06/22/tv/jon-and-kate-announcement/comment-page-1/#comment-942</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 00:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jammersblog.com/?p=395#comment-942</guid>
		<description>Jammer,

Yeah, the whole Network being blanded with everything else so there is no uniqueness anymore could be a good topic.  One great example, Scifi Channel turing itself into Syfy, or MTV showing Star Wars movies, or another network getting CSI New York, putting that show on like 4 stations now. It&#039;s ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jammer,</p>
<p>Yeah, the whole Network being blanded with everything else so there is no uniqueness anymore could be a good topic.  One great example, Scifi Channel turing itself into Syfy, or MTV showing Star Wars movies, or another network getting CSI New York, putting that show on like 4 stations now. It&#8217;s ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/06/22/tv/jon-and-kate-announcement/comment-page-1/#comment-941</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jammersblog.com/?p=395#comment-941</guid>
		<description>Jammer, I am guessing that you will NOT be purchasing a set of Jon &amp; Kate Souvenir Divorce Tiles? Only $39.99!

http://cgi.ebay.com/The-Jon-Kate-Gosselin-8-Souvenir-Divorce-Tiles_W0QQitemZ120437590040QQcmdZViewItemQQptZLH_DefaultDomain_0?hash=item1c0aa3c818&amp;_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&amp;_trkparms=65%3A12%7C66%3A2%7C39%3A1%7C72%3A1205%7C240%3A1318%7C301%3A0%7C293%3A1%7C294%3A50</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jammer, I am guessing that you will NOT be purchasing a set of Jon &amp; Kate Souvenir Divorce Tiles? Only $39.99!</p>
<p><a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/The-Jon-Kate-Gosselin-8-Souvenir-Divorce-Tiles_W0QQitemZ120437590040QQcmdZViewItemQQptZLH_DefaultDomain_0?hash=item1c0aa3c818&#038;_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&#038;_trkparms=65%3A12%7C66%3A2%7C39%3A1%7C72%3A1205%7C240%3A1318%7C301%3A0%7C293%3A1%7C294%3A50" rel="nofollow">http://cgi.ebay.com/The-Jon-Kate-Gosselin-8-Souvenir-Divorce-Tiles_W0QQitemZ120437590040QQcmdZViewItemQQptZLH_DefaultDomain_0?hash=item1c0aa3c818&#038;_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&#038;_trkparms=65%3A12%7C66%3A2%7C39%3A1%7C72%3A1205%7C240%3A1318%7C301%3A0%7C293%3A1%7C294%3A50</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Occuprice</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/06/22/tv/jon-and-kate-announcement/comment-page-1/#comment-940</link>
		<dc:creator>Occuprice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 03:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jammersblog.com/?p=395#comment-940</guid>
		<description>Last summer I watched more than my share of episodes in a few viewing marathons with my sister. I liked it and it was one of those shows I was planning on keeping tabs on every now and then. Since all this scandal stuff started, I&#039;ve made it a point not to watch it. Not because I think it&#039;s damaging the show (I wouldn&#039;t know, not having watched it) but because it&#039;s pretty obvious the station and the parents are using this scandal to draw in more viewers, and I&#039;m not okay with that for this show. Most reality shows center on the types of conflict we&#039;re now seeing on JK+8, and that&#039;s the reason I don&#039;t watch them. It&#039;s stupid crap. I thought JK+8 was amusing and entertaining to watch now and then because it WASN&#039;T that type of reality show. Can&#039;t say that anymore. Using the scandal to increase the ratings is both against the core of the show and it reveals that this really IS just about the money.... not about the kids on the show. Guess I was being naive when I thought it might be otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last summer I watched more than my share of episodes in a few viewing marathons with my sister. I liked it and it was one of those shows I was planning on keeping tabs on every now and then. Since all this scandal stuff started, I&#8217;ve made it a point not to watch it. Not because I think it&#8217;s damaging the show (I wouldn&#8217;t know, not having watched it) but because it&#8217;s pretty obvious the station and the parents are using this scandal to draw in more viewers, and I&#8217;m not okay with that for this show. Most reality shows center on the types of conflict we&#8217;re now seeing on JK+8, and that&#8217;s the reason I don&#8217;t watch them. It&#8217;s stupid crap. I thought JK+8 was amusing and entertaining to watch now and then because it WASN&#8217;T that type of reality show. Can&#8217;t say that anymore. Using the scandal to increase the ratings is both against the core of the show and it reveals that this really IS just about the money&#8230;. not about the kids on the show. Guess I was being naive when I thought it might be otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/06/22/tv/jon-and-kate-announcement/comment-page-1/#comment-938</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jammersblog.com/?p=395#comment-938</guid>
		<description>The Lame Channel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Lame Channel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remco</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/06/22/tv/jon-and-kate-announcement/comment-page-1/#comment-937</link>
		<dc:creator>Remco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jammersblog.com/?p=395#comment-937</guid>
		<description>The Lost Children</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Lost Children</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jammer</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/06/22/tv/jon-and-kate-announcement/comment-page-1/#comment-936</link>
		<dc:creator>Jammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jammersblog.com/?p=395#comment-936</guid>
		<description>I meant to mention the irony of TLC formerly being The Learning Channel, but I forgot. (I actually don&#039;t think it technically stands for that anymore. I think TLC now merely stands for ... TLC.)

Actually, the subject of what cable networks are now and what they used to be (in terms of names and acronyms, etc.) might make for its own blog post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to mention the irony of TLC formerly being The Learning Channel, but I forgot. (I actually don&#8217;t think it technically stands for that anymore. I think TLC now merely stands for &#8230; TLC.)</p>
<p>Actually, the subject of what cable networks are now and what they used to be (in terms of names and acronyms, etc.) might make for its own blog post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Lebovic</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/06/22/tv/jon-and-kate-announcement/comment-page-1/#comment-935</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Lebovic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jammersblog.com/?p=395#comment-935</guid>
		<description>Amen!

&quot;Jon watches Kate make Hate&quot; is perhaps not legally exploitative (right word?) but is morally exploitative.  The fault does not just like at the feet of perpetually spaced-out Jon and coiled-like-a-cobra Kate.  &quot;The Learning Channel&quot; - gosh, I love the irony in that - is responsible for putting this swill on television and for keeping it there.  

There will always be a demand for the teleivision airwaves to beam swill directly before our eyes.  Rarely, though, has the attempt to pawn off such swill as &quot;educatinal&quot; been so disingenuous as it has been with this show.  Say what you will about The Jerry Springer Show - its host knew he was running a carny show with freak (possibly staged-freakdom) guests.  Jerry never pretended he or our show was enlightening us.  But the solemnity of the commercials promoting &quot;J&amp;K,&quot; suggests that the viewer is not going to be treated to a simple dose of trash but to something more: a learning experience.  &quot;See, this is what families with multiples are like.&quot;  Wrong.  It&#039;s what unhappy families on camera are like and how the constant presence of the camera  - which has an unobstrusively blunt way of making the best and worst of people stand out - can pervert people - or pervert them further.   Even the younger children now (by walking around with the technical people, smiling to the cameramen on cue) must be getting the notion that life involves something more than being raised by a mother and father.  They did not ask to be robbed of their privacy.  Strange, how we have parental consent laws in this country when it comes to things such as child labor laws (especially when it comes to children working beyond a certain amount of hours on a movie set), but when the parents are the ones who are making the money, parents&#039; safety for their children seems to be thrown under the bus.  Shows like this are a disgrace and to the extent they have any socially redeeming value to US, the psychological devastation in ways &quot;both subtle and gross&quot; (as Q once said) inflicted and self-inflicted upon the participants more than outweigh such value. I&#039;d liek to think that the cancellation of this show - for whatever reason, were it to happen, were a good thing - but a cancellation would probably merely encourage a TV producer to think, &quot;It&#039;s not that we had a bad itdea.  We just didn&#039;t do it right this time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen!</p>
<p>&#8220;Jon watches Kate make Hate&#8221; is perhaps not legally exploitative (right word?) but is morally exploitative.  The fault does not just like at the feet of perpetually spaced-out Jon and coiled-like-a-cobra Kate.  &#8220;The Learning Channel&#8221; &#8211; gosh, I love the irony in that &#8211; is responsible for putting this swill on television and for keeping it there.  </p>
<p>There will always be a demand for the teleivision airwaves to beam swill directly before our eyes.  Rarely, though, has the attempt to pawn off such swill as &#8220;educatinal&#8221; been so disingenuous as it has been with this show.  Say what you will about The Jerry Springer Show &#8211; its host knew he was running a carny show with freak (possibly staged-freakdom) guests.  Jerry never pretended he or our show was enlightening us.  But the solemnity of the commercials promoting &#8220;J&amp;K,&#8221; suggests that the viewer is not going to be treated to a simple dose of trash but to something more: a learning experience.  &#8220;See, this is what families with multiples are like.&#8221;  Wrong.  It&#8217;s what unhappy families on camera are like and how the constant presence of the camera  &#8211; which has an unobstrusively blunt way of making the best and worst of people stand out &#8211; can pervert people &#8211; or pervert them further.   Even the younger children now (by walking around with the technical people, smiling to the cameramen on cue) must be getting the notion that life involves something more than being raised by a mother and father.  They did not ask to be robbed of their privacy.  Strange, how we have parental consent laws in this country when it comes to things such as child labor laws (especially when it comes to children working beyond a certain amount of hours on a movie set), but when the parents are the ones who are making the money, parents&#8217; safety for their children seems to be thrown under the bus.  Shows like this are a disgrace and to the extent they have any socially redeeming value to US, the psychological devastation in ways &#8220;both subtle and gross&#8221; (as Q once said) inflicted and self-inflicted upon the participants more than outweigh such value. I&#8217;d liek to think that the cancellation of this show &#8211; for whatever reason, were it to happen, were a good thing &#8211; but a cancellation would probably merely encourage a TV producer to think, &#8220;It&#8217;s not that we had a bad itdea.  We just didn&#8217;t do it right this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/06/22/tv/jon-and-kate-announcement/comment-page-1/#comment-933</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jammersblog.com/?p=395#comment-933</guid>
		<description>In 15 years all those kids will probably be screwed up. I didn&#039;t see any harm in it before when it was about 2 parents raising 6 babies and 2 toddlers... but now? Its exploitive of them in a time of crisis... imagine having your days recorded for a TV show while you&#039;re parents are divorcing, one of the hardest things a kid can go through?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 15 years all those kids will probably be screwed up. I didn&#8217;t see any harm in it before when it was about 2 parents raising 6 babies and 2 toddlers&#8230; but now? Its exploitive of them in a time of crisis&#8230; imagine having your days recorded for a TV show while you&#8217;re parents are divorcing, one of the hardest things a kid can go through?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

