<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jammer&#039;s Blog &#187; Movies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jammersblog.com/category/movies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jammersblog.com</link>
	<description>It Do What It Do</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:59:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>3D cinema? Possibly. 3D television? Please get real.</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2010/01/06/tv/3d-get-real/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2010/01/06/tv/3d-get-real/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jammersblog.com/?p=438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The film industry has been trying to push 3D on its customers for a while now, but it has just in the past year or so shifted that campaign into high gear. 2009 had a number of notable titles to be released in movie theaters in 3D (most of them CGI-animated productions that easily lend [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2010/01/06/tv/3d-get-real/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;2012&#039;: You want apocalypse? You GOT apocalypse.</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/11/24/movies/2012-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/11/24/movies/2012-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jammersblog.com/?p=426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some movies speak for themselves. One such movie is 2012, which comes billed as the end of the world, Roland Emmerich style. This review could simply state &#34;Roland Emmerich destroys the world for real this time&#34; and that would probably be sufficient. If you've seen any of his other movies, you know more or less [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/11/24/movies/2012-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why does Robert Zemeckis hate live action?</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/11/18/movies/robert-zemeckis-animation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/11/18/movies/robert-zemeckis-animation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jammersblog.com/?p=423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in the day &#8212; a long, long time ago &#8212; Robert Zemeckis was best known for directing Back to the Future and its eventual sequels. He probably became a big mainstream name with the massive success of Forrest Gump. That movie also perhaps signaled the beginning of the end for Zemeckis as a traditional [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/11/18/movies/robert-zemeckis-animation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why does Roland Emmerich hate the world?</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/11/10/movies/roland-emmerich-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/11/10/movies/roland-emmerich-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jammersblog.com/?p=419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Friday, the much-advertised gargantuan-FX behemoth 2012 comes out. The film is the latest world-destroying epic from director Roland Emmerich, perhaps best known for his entertaining world-destroying Independence Day, his not-so-entertaining NY-destroying Godzilla '98 and his decidedly ungood world-destroyed-by-climate-change The Day After Tomorrow.
What! Fucking! Ian guy?! There was a time that John Cusack had girlfriend [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/11/10/movies/roland-emmerich-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;At the Movies&#039; reboot unbooted</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/08/06/tv/at-the-movies-reboot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/08/06/tv/at-the-movies-reboot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jammersblog.com/?p=407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[File this one under &#34;they told you so.&#34; About a year ago, Roger Ebert and Richard Roeper left &#34;Ebert &#038; Roeper &#038; the Movies&#34; after Disney-ABC Television attempted to retool the show into something that it wasn't. Ebert, who owns the trademarks for &#34;Thumbs Up&#34; and &#34;Thumbs Down&#34; had already been in less-than-successful negotiations with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/08/06/tv/at-the-movies-reboot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;Transformers 2&#039;: Less than meets the eye. Much less.</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/07/09/movies/transformers-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/07/09/movies/transformers-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 02:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jammersblog.com/?p=400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Complaining about Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen after you've actually paid to go see it is kind of like complaining after commanding someone to punch you in the face. They might not have done it the way you wanted them to do it, but you sort of knew what you were getting yourself into. It's [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/07/09/movies/transformers-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The war officially ends today</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2008/02/19/tv/format-war-ends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2008/02/19/tv/format-war-ends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idwid.com/blog/archives/121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After two years, the war is finally over. I'm talking, of course, about the format war between rival high-def next-generation DVD formats HD DVD (manufactured by Toshiba) and Blu-ray (Sony).
The writing has been on the wall for about a month now, as media companies &#8212; some that had remained neutral until recently &#8212; have been [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2008/02/19/tv/format-war-ends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A public service announcement from David Lynch</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2008/02/12/tech/david-lynch-psa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2008/02/12/tech/david-lynch-psa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor & Obscure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idwid.com/blog/archives/120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Internet is the future of video, as has been proven by the WGA strike (which looks to be officially ending this week). But watching movies on the Internet is still not a particularly good option, in my opinion. It can provide a substitute in a pinch, but with current technology and bandwidth, it's not [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2008/02/12/tech/david-lynch-psa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obviously, you&#039;re not a golfer</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/10/11/movies/big-lebowski/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/10/11/movies/big-lebowski/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idwid.com/blog/archives/88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you don't understand immediately what the headline of this blog entry means, then obviously, you're not a Duder.
Everybody quotes movies. But some of us quote movies more often than others, and some movies get quoted a whole hell of a lot more than others. 





Mark that frame an eight, and you're entering a world [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/10/11/movies/big-lebowski/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HD DVD? Blu-ray? None of the above, for now.</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/09/10/tv/hd-format-war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/09/10/tv/hd-format-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 04:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idwid.com/blog/archives/79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember in the 1980s when VHS and Betamax duked it out? Apparently the manufacturers of the future of home video have not learned from past mistakes (or, more specifically, they don't much care that consumers will by and large stand on the sidelines while they duke it out), and we're doomed to repeat the Format [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/09/10/tv/hd-format-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three movie directors with too much hype</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/07/26/movies/overhyped-movie-directors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/07/26/movies/overhyped-movie-directors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 22:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idwid.com/blog/archives/73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I sometimes wonder how it is that certain movie directors earn enough cachet in Hollywood to become name brands. Sure, I can understand the idea of a &#34;name brand&#34; being applied to the likes of Steven Spielberg or Martin Scorsese or a dozen others &#8212; although it should be noted that Spielberg is more of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/07/26/movies/overhyped-movie-directors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What? &#039;Die Hard 4&#039; rated PG-13?</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/06/21/movies/die-hard-4-rating/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/06/21/movies/die-hard-4-rating/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idwid.com/blog/archives/61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, it's official. &#34;Live Free or Die Hard&#34; has been rated PG-13. There was a time when I could not fathom a &#34;Die Hard&#34; movie without an R rating, but given today's climate, this PG-13 was inevitable. The first three &#34;Die Hards&#34; were released when studios actually put out R-rated action flicks. Now studios believe [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/06/21/movies/die-hard-4-rating/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;Rated R for strong graphic smoking...&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/05/11/rants/rated-r-for-strong-graphic-smoking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/05/11/rants/rated-r-for-strong-graphic-smoking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 00:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idwid.com/blog/archives/43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is everyone so wrapped up in their personal crusades that they can't see anything from the standpoint of basic logic? 
It was reported today that the MPAA will start using smoking as one of the factors in how a movie gets its rating. Smoking will also become one of the descriptors that will end up [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/05/11/rants/rated-r-for-strong-graphic-smoking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
