<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jammer&#039;s Blog &#187; Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jammersblog.com/category/tech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jammersblog.com</link>
	<description>It Do What It Do</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:59:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Who needs the iPad? Nobody, I&#039;m sure.</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2010/04/04/rants/who-needs-the-ipad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2010/04/04/rants/who-needs-the-ipad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 06:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jammersblog.com/?p=478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The headline pretty much says it all. What is the point of the iPad? I think this may be the perfect example of the consumer product that exists first and foremost to fleece its buyers out of their money. Goal #2: To convince them that it's great in the absence of these customers having better [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2010/04/04/rants/who-needs-the-ipad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter: Let&#039;s get this party started</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2010/01/27/tech/twitter-launch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2010/01/27/tech/twitter-launch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 04:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jammersblog.com/?p=444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year, I posted my position that was not exactly anti-Twitter, but certainly not at all for it, either. I wondered whether it was a fad, and questioned its utility as a worthwhile endeavor on the Internets, where we use the Google and stuff.

Twitter. A-holes. Silly bird and cartoon T make me feel compelled to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2010/01/27/tech/twitter-launch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3D cinema? Possibly. 3D television? Please get real.</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2010/01/06/tv/3d-get-real/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2010/01/06/tv/3d-get-real/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jammersblog.com/?p=438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The film industry has been trying to push 3D on its customers for a while now, but it has just in the past year or so shifted that campaign into high gear. 2009 had a number of notable titles to be released in movie theaters in 3D (most of them CGI-animated productions that easily lend [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2010/01/06/tv/3d-get-real/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Microsoft Windows 7</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/10/22/tech/windows-7-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/10/22/tech/windows-7-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor & Obscure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jammersblog.com/?p=416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, this isn't a review, but an announcement that there will not be a review of Windows 7, because I find Windows 7 to be inexplicable. 
After all, why in the world would I want to downgrade 88 versions from Windows 95?
I'm here all week, folks.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/10/22/tech/windows-7-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abandoning the battle against spam</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/09/24/tech/spam-battle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/09/24/tech/spam-battle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jammersblog.com/?p=413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don't understand why people are so afraid of spam in this day and age. It seems to me that people get overly concerned about giving out their e-mail address to companies or web sites or what-have-you, because &#34;they're going to send me a bunch of stuff I don't want.&#34;
Well, I suppose there's a kernel [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/09/24/tech/spam-battle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter: Latest fad for the &#039;Information Superhighway&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/04/29/tech/twitter-fad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/04/29/tech/twitter-fad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jammersblog.com/?p=149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Internet is particularly susceptible to media fad mentality. Back in the early days of the Web's mainstreaming (about 1995), people in the media loved throwing around goofy fad terms like &#34;Cyberspace,&#34; &#34;Virtual Realm,&#34; and the &#34;Information Superhighway.&#34;

Twitter provides you with plenty of Tweets, which are sort of like dumber versions of blog entries.
The latter [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2009/04/29/tech/twitter-fad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The war officially ends today</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2008/02/19/tv/format-war-ends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2008/02/19/tv/format-war-ends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idwid.com/blog/archives/121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After two years, the war is finally over. I'm talking, of course, about the format war between rival high-def next-generation DVD formats HD DVD (manufactured by Toshiba) and Blu-ray (Sony).
The writing has been on the wall for about a month now, as media companies &#8212; some that had remained neutral until recently &#8212; have been [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2008/02/19/tv/format-war-ends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A public service announcement from David Lynch</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2008/02/12/tech/david-lynch-psa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2008/02/12/tech/david-lynch-psa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor & Obscure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idwid.com/blog/archives/120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Internet is the future of video, as has been proven by the WGA strike (which looks to be officially ending this week). But watching movies on the Internet is still not a particularly good option, in my opinion. It can provide a substitute in a pinch, but with current technology and bandwidth, it's not [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2008/02/12/tech/david-lynch-psa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Better organization is costing me too much time</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2008/01/22/tv/content-organization/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2008/01/22/tv/content-organization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idwid.com/blog/archives/114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With some technology, for some reason or another, I end up being a slow adopter. This includes two of the most mainstream and useful media technologies of the past decade: RSS and DVR. 
For a very long time, I was not a believer in RSS. As a web site admninstator I recognized its popularity and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2008/01/22/tv/content-organization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The world&#039;s friendliest spam bot</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/12/18/tech/friendliest-spam-bot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/12/18/tech/friendliest-spam-bot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor & Obscure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idwid.com/blog/archives/107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spam is one of the scourges of the Internet. (How's that for the most obvious statement of the year?) There was a time not long ago, before I eliminated one of my constantly-spammed e-mail addresses, that I was getting upwards of 250 spam messages a day. I'm sure that number is low by some people's [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/12/18/tech/friendliest-spam-bot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#039;m done with McAfee VirusScan</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/11/14/rants/done-with-mcafee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/11/14/rants/done-with-mcafee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 07:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idwid.com/blog/archives/97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For years and years and years, I've been a loyal customer of McAfee for their virus protection and security software. Lots of people swear by Norton, but I've never been one of their customers; just didn't happen that way. There's a saying in retail that if you can get a customer early in their buying [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/11/14/rants/done-with-mcafee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does anybody care about GO.com?</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/10/19/tech/go-dot-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/10/19/tech/go-dot-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idwid.com/blog/archives/91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Disney is a corporate media juggernaut, like Viacom and News Corp. As such a juggernaut, Walt Disney Company has more arms than, uh ... well, a six-armed man. Yeah.
The Internet portal for all things in the Disney conglomerate is GO.com. What I can't figure out is what the point of GO.com is. It's your classic [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/10/19/tech/go-dot-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HD DVD? Blu-ray? None of the above, for now.</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/09/10/tv/hd-format-war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/09/10/tv/hd-format-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 04:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idwid.com/blog/archives/79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember in the 1980s when VHS and Betamax duked it out? Apparently the manufacturers of the future of home video have not learned from past mistakes (or, more specifically, they don't much care that consumers will by and large stand on the sidelines while they duke it out), and we're doomed to repeat the Format [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/09/10/tv/hd-format-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stop saying &#039;backslash,&#039; you computer illiterates</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/08/02/rants/stop-saying-backslash/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/08/02/rants/stop-saying-backslash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 22:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idwid.com/blog/archives/74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Working in a building where there are still plenty of people who are behind on the whole web/technological curve, one of my biggest pet peeves is when people say &#34;backslash&#34; when they really mean &#34;slash.&#34; 
Whenever they want to put some promotion in print that refers to an online page, I get marketing or advertising [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/08/02/rants/stop-saying-backslash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wow, and you thought I was anti-iPhone</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/07/24/tech/anti-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/07/24/tech/anti-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idwid.com/blog/archives/72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just read the most vitriolic and hilarious anti-iPhone post that's probably possible. Read it here. 
APPLE FANS NEED NOT APPLY, for the same reason they need not bother reading Maddox's previous anti-Apple post. You will probably not find it funny because you love Apple so much and don't feel a need to see it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/07/24/tech/anti-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get a life, you iPhone-crazy fools</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/06/28/rants/iphone-fools/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/06/28/rants/iphone-fools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 18:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idwid.com/blog/archives/64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've heard enough about the iPhone. This must be the most overly hyped thing since Paris Hilton getting out of jail. (Good thing there's something we can over-hype just about every single day.) Speaking of Paris Hilton, if you watched her interview on CNN last night, shame on you, because you have given in to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/06/28/rants/iphone-fools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When dot-com ventures turn personal</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/06/13/tech/dot-com-turmoil/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/06/13/tech/dot-com-turmoil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idwid.com/blog/archives/59</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here's some food for thought: If you are running a web site, make sure that you maintain as much control over your domain name as you can. That sounds like a no-brainer, but I made a mistake back in 1999. I realized it later but I let it go for a long time (years) and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/06/13/tech/dot-com-turmoil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Go get 16:9 content for your 16:9 TVs, you morons</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/05/14/tv/hdtv-content/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/05/14/tv/hdtv-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 00:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idwid.com/blog/archives/46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All right. Enough is enough. HDTVs are coming down in price, SDTVs are turning into dinosaurs that are barely advertised in the Best Buy and Circuit City flyers, and content providers (that is, your cable or satellite service and your DVD player) offer the content you need to take advantage of the newer screen formats. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/05/14/tv/hdtv-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Windows Vista a flop?</title>
		<link>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/05/02/tech/windows-vista-flop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/05/02/tech/windows-vista-flop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 16:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jamahl Epsicokhan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idwid.com/blog/archives/36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I ask that question, I need to qualify it. Obviously, Microsoft is going to sell lots of licenses of Windows Vista, if for no other reason than because it has been loaded on every new PC sold from Jan. 30 forward. (Although, Dell recently announced that it would also continue to sell some XP [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jammersblog.com/2007/05/02/tech/windows-vista-flop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
